Powered By Blogger

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Who Should Buy an Annuity?

On several occasions, I have gotten into a discussion with someone who is what I would consider a sophisticated investor. After all, someone who knows how to balance their risk, spread it out among a variety of investments, use calls and puts, stop loss and so on knows what they are doing, at least that has been my assumption. A portfolio should include a mix of stocks, bonds and international stocks. A book I am reading has 43 different portfolio mixes that include equities, real estate and good old fashioned cash. The goal is to keep up with the market and take advantage of the gains while avoiding the losses. One of the portfolios has 54% US stocks, 12% international stocks, 22% bonds with the remaining 12% in real estate, natural resources and cash. Of the US stocks, it is suggested you have 27% large-cap value, 12% large-cap growth, and so on. As the market shifts, you will want to rebalance your funds to manage your losses. Rebalancing. That means you have to know which of all that you need to sell, pay someone to sell it, then pay someone to buy something else. Where does the profit come in?

This assumes, in my opinion, that the markets move slowly enough to let me catch my breath, buy low, sell high and move on. That isn't how the market works. It is a very, very fast moving machine that doesn't care who gets in the way.

The big investors with billions and trillions of dollars in the market go a few steps further. Companies use huge banks of computers to constantly buy and sell stocks, owning something for only a fraction of a second. Stocks are sold in lots far larger than any ordinary investor such as myself, would ever be able to manage. Buys and sells are based on complicated algorithms that watch every stock for any sort of movement with no regard to poor management, poor returns or much of anything human-based. The computer just watches when a stock shifts one way or another and makes a move toward it. You may recall a few years ago when there was a very large drop in the market that returned a few minutes later all due to someone making a mistake with a computer.

Large numbers have an advantage over small. If I have $1,000 of stock and it earns 1%, I now have $1,010. If I have a billion dollars of that same stock, I now have $10 million. That is power. My little thousand, or hundred thousand, or even a million dollars has no effect on the market. Thus, as an investor I am completely dependent on the actions of fast moving humming computers which don't care an ounce about me. The days of people yelling and screaming on the stock market floor are gone. The analogy I see is myself standing on the freeway in the center divide with my car, trying to get across to safety. I might do it, but my chances are very small.

What is the purpose of an investment? To make my money grow. Savings protects my money but investing makes it bigger. Why do I want my money to grow? Because the cost of everything around me is constantly growing and I need to keep up. Investments with guaranteed returns such as annuities and life insurance are the foundation of my security. Putting my future entirely in the market is just a gamble and one that I will surely lose. Once I have protected my future than I am ready to buy that high tech stock or start my string of rental homes. Before that is done, take care of business. Get a plan and stick to it.

If I want my money to grow, I also want to have a tax advantage. I showed earlier that if I have $1 and let it double every year for 20 years without taxes, I would have over $1mil. But if I had to pay taxes of, say, 35%, each year as it grew, I would only have around $26,000. I mention this here because when I buy and sell stocks, I have to keep paying taxes on my gains.

Another thing I get tired of hearing is that this fund or that has an "average return" of some X%. The trouble with that is the average is not the actual return. Thus growing one year by 50% and losing 50% the next has an average return of 0. If I have $100 and it grows to $150 the first year, the next year I lose half, $75, leaving me with an actual return of -25%.
The insurance products guarantee that I will never lose money. Guarantees cost money, but never as much as the result of the guarantee.

Thus in my humble opinion, no matter how much money I have, I would not be wise to depend on market fluctuations for my future. I want some guarantees and then I will spin the roulette wheel for luck.

Am I an unsophisticated investor if I want to be sure that my financial foundation is strong? I don't think so.  Who should buy an annuity?  Anyone who is going to depend on their savings for their retirement.  I am one of those people.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Make Your Own Pension with an Annuity

If you have been reading up until now, you know that I started this blog talking about how a friend of mine got me to buy an annuity to protect my retirement savings. I had heard of annuities before, but didn't really understand them. Thus, I have done much reading lately and this is what I learned.

An annuity is a savings fund that you can build just like an IRA or a 401k. You buy them through a life insurance company which gives protection of your investment. Some have fees involved while others do not. The traditional annuity would let you save money, have it grow, and then, when you retire, you can have it pay you money each month for the rest of your life. At least, that is what I thought they were and then I did some more research.

Three things need to be decided before you sign up.

How do you want to put money in it?

How do you want to grow?

How do you want to take money out?

Putting money in can be either one big amount like rolling over an old IRA you have been watching shrink or maybe some CDs you have been praying the Fed will allow growth over 1%. Otherwise, you can set up a payment plan similar to your IRA. If you want it pre-tax, it can be a traditional IRA or if you want after tax money, make it a Roth. Both are subject to limitations, which I won't go into here. And finally you can start with a large sum and then continue to put money into it.

Growth depends on how much risk you want. The choices are fixed, variable and indexed. Fixed has a set rate that it pays and never changes. Variable lets you put your money into mutual funds and other investments. Indexed pays interest based on the return of one or more market funds like the S&P 500. Variable annuities carry the risk of market changes so you could end up with a loss, unless you have a rider that maintains your balance at the highest market level and then pays interest when the market is down. That is what I have. It is a bit expensive, but it is giving me such a good return, the fees are minimal by comparison.

Indexed annuities come in all sorts of variations, but have more flexibility at taking money out without having to annuitize. If you do that, most will stop growing and pay you something every month until you die, if you so choose.

Have I lost you yet? If so, be sure to leave a comment in my blog and I can respond. Basically, there are many variations to an annuity. I prefer to buy the ones that guarantee growth and protect me from market variations.

My annuity is a variable deferred annuity with a minimum return. If I choose to annuitize it some day, I can get a life payment. Should I die before my wife does, she will continue to get payments until she goes. I rolled over my money from an IRA that was previously a rollover from my 401k's I had built over the years in various jobs. Since the money is from a pre-tax savings plan, I will have to pay taxes on the money some day when I take payments from it. With that, I have introduced a number of terms that I will explain.

For receiving payment some day, there are two basic types of annuities; immediate and deferred. Immediate annuities are usually started with a single large payment. Deferred annuities multiple payments over a number of years, similar to a 401k or they can be funded with one single payment. The idea is to build up a fund that will some day pay you money to live on for a certain period of time. Later I will discuss the many ways you can receive payments.

One final benefit to annuities is there is a death benefit. Should I die, the insurance company guarantees my beneficiaries a certain amount.

I wrote earlier about the four cornerstones of a good investment should include Growth, Safety from market changes, Tax Advantages and Protection for my family. For my annuity I get fantastic growth. In just a year and a half I have grown 20% so I am happy. Since I have the rider to pay me interest when the market drops, I have safety. The tax advantage is based on how I saved in the beginning. Since I rolled my IRA money over to it, I have a tax-deferred plan. As such, I will have to pay taxes as I take money out. And then finally I have the protection for my family should I die.

All in all, I think it is much safer to put my money into an annuity. But there is another solution. If I were younger, I could have done something else. I could have funded a permanent life insurance policy and taken all my growth out tax-free. In my next blog I will talk about how to do that.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

When the long run becomes the present

I was reading another investment book.  This one is says that you shouldn't panic when the market drops and keep your stocks.  But sooner or later that long term investment comes due and you have to start drawing down.  I compare it to milking a running cow.  Sure it has milk, but you can't get much if it won't sit still.  Depending on the market, whether it is stocks or mutual funds, is going to leave you constantly worrying about your next check.  Pensions were supposed to eliminate that worry until they disappeared. 

The market dropped almost 1,000 points this last week.  If you moved fast enough, you might have moved your money to cash equivalents like CDs, but that means you are paying fees to a broker to sell your stocks adding to your cost.  Cost is not adding to your value.  It takes away.  The market will ultimately return to its original value which means you have a net gain of ZERO.  And when the market returns you can buy stock again. 

Wait a minute!  I thought we were supposed to buy low and sell high?  The trouble is that people panic and get out when things are going bad and get back in when it is too late.  The dream is to beat the market but statistically that just doesn't happen often enough.  You have a better chance of hitting it big in Las Vegas.  The real winners in stock market swings are the stock brokers.  They get commissions when they buy or sell.  A good business for them. 

My annuity lets me invest in the market and I get to take advantage of the growth when it happens.  It also has a rider, an extra benefit, that I paid for.  That guarantees that when the market rises, I win.  When the market drops, they hold my value at the top and start paying interest.  So I win again. 

When the time comes for me to retire, I can do one of two things.  I can either tell the insurance company to annuitize my investment and they will pay me a percentage of it for the rest of my life.  A good deal.  Also, I have it set so if I die before my wife, she also continues to collect this pension until she dies.  I think that is a great deal.  When I do this, my account value will freeze and I will get the same pension amount forever.

Another way to do this, though, is to take out a part of the annuity each year without annuitizing.  When I do this, the fund continues to grow, often right back to the value it was before I made my withdrawal.  There are a number of rules and limits regarding this, but that varies from annuity to annuity. 

Try that with your collection of mutual funds and stocks and see if you can get the same results.  When the market is going up, you can.  When the market goes down, though, you will need to cut back what you withdraw and hope the market recovers by the next year.  If you like gambling with your life savings at the age of 85, go ahead.  I prefer some protection, myself, and I don't want to have to worry about it.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Where is the bottom of the market?

The market fell another 500+ points today and will probably continue to fall for a few more weeks.  No one can predict where it will bottom out but anyone trying to live on their 401k money will be forced to make some tough decisions. 

For instance, imagine you had a fund worth $300,000 before the market started to fall.  You were able to take 5% a year to add to your living expenses, or $15,000.  Then suddenly the value of your account drops to $225,000.  What do you do?  You got used to getting $15,000.  Now, though, if you take that much you will be taking out almost 7% bringing your account value down to $210,000.  From there, you will need to have much faster growth to get back to where you were before.

Why 5%?  Assuming you retire at 65, it is reasonable to assume you will live another 20 years to 85 and 1/20th of the total balance is 5%.  Since we don't know when we will die, we are gambling that we will be gone by then, not to mention the fact that inflation could also eat up the value of your withdrawals.  When you start taking 7% or more you are cutting into your future and could end up broke when you are too old to get another job.

Thus, depending on the stock market for your retirement is a bit like diving into a pool blindfolded and hoping someone put water in it.  My annuity continues to grow. 

I mentioned a few posts ago that the market has become extremely inflated by all the 401k money held by unprofessional investors.  When we see the market take a dive, we panic, we worry and then we take some action that is probably not wise.  Thus, moving your money to something stable with guaranteed growth and cool-headed investment managers looking out for my better interest might help you sleep much better at night. 

I am not endorsing any particular company here.  You need to do your own research.  What I would recommend, though, is that you give annuities some serious thought as a way to protect both your future and your present.  In future writings I will explain how annuities work. 

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Now or later - What type of plan do you need?

Here is a primer on the ways you can save for retirement. Each has it advantages and disadvantages. 
  • Pay taxes now - These are traditional savings accounts and stock and bond investments. A bank pays me interest each year and I pay taxes on it immediately. If the stock pays a dividend, I am taxed. And when I sell the stock or bond I have to pay taxes on what I earned. I have prepared taxes for folks for several years, and these always cause the most disappointment. They come in with a big smile on their face with their statements from their investment firm, to show me how much they made on the stock market this year. I then have to tell then that they now I taxes as regular income at their normal withholding rate. What this means is that they not only have to pay taxes on the earnings, the income could push them into a higher tax bracket causing them to pay even more tax. The advantage is that the cash is easily available which is where I would want to keep my emergency fund.  
  • The trouble with this method is that when I pay taxes as I go along, I never get ahead. For instance, consider starting with one dollar and double it every year for 20 years without paying taxes. How much would you have? The answer is over one million dollars! But take that same dollar and double it each year and pay taxes as you earn it. What would I have then? About $27,000 assuming a 30% income tax rate. Enter the pretax savings plans.
  • Pay taxes later with tax free growth - 401k, 403b and IRA all let me deduct money from my paycheck before taxes are deducted. The money is placed into a fund managed by someone like Vanguard or Fidelity, who offer a number of mutual funds for growth. Also, when, or if, the money grows, the income isn't taxed until I take it out. Money taken from my pay is usually based on a percentage of my total pay. Also a few of my employers gave me a match up to a certain limit. For instance, if I were to save 5% of my paycheck, the employer will give me another 2 to 5%. It all depends on the employer and how generous they want to be. I like free money.  This method is better because I can take advantage of growth without paying taxes, as I mentioned earlier. There are no free lunches, though, because I will have to pay taxes on the money as I withdraw it. And no matter how you may feel about taxes, one thing is certain. Taxes will increase. Our national debt has to be paid and we have to pay it someday.

For example, if I need to have $50,000 cash to live on each year, and my only source of income is from my pre-tax account, I will have to withdraw at least $70,000 to cover both what you need and what Uncle Sam wants.
  • Never pay taxes with after tax money and tax free growth - The Roth IRA lets me take money from my payroll after I have paid taxes on it and invest it. The growth is tax-free while it grows, and, if I keep it the required number of years, I can take out the earnings tax-free as well. Unfortunately, for most of us, we can only put $5,000 per year or $6,000, if I am over 50. Not quite enough money for a big nest egg, but a good start.
What I want, though, is something I can invest it, not pay taxes as it grows, not pay taxes when I spend it and have something left to take care of my family when I die. And maybe, if I am a good planner, I could even use it for part of my retirement money.

Other than the pay now tax now savings accounts, all the other methods are for a long term plan. I should not put my money in with the expectation of taking it out until retirement.

After all, what I want, when I retire, is the ability to continue getting a paycheck. I don't want some huge windfall of cash because I would still need to put it somewhere safe so I can take it out as I need it. Given that, there are two ways I can invest my money into something that will protect my money from the falls in the market, give a death benefit to my wife, grow, and give me a tax advantage with the growth. For me, at my age, I would invest in annuities. For someone younger, say in their 20's, they would want to give serious consideration to a permanent life insurance policy.











Thursday, July 7, 2011

Coulda, Shoulda, Woulda

$108,000 from $100k in ten years.  I could have done better keeping it in a savings account.  That would have been a poor choice, as well, though.  What would have happened if I had met my friend ten years earlier?  Would I have more in savings and how much would that be?  Leaving my money in my IRA let me ride the market with all its ups and downs.  The annuity had protection from the market that I couldn't get in my IRA.  First, here is how my money grew in ten years without protection.
Between 2000 and 2003, I lost almost $40,000.  Then the market recovered with that big bubble everyone talked about, but didn't do much to change.  Besides, who knew about credit default swaps and such?  I certainly didn't.  By 2007 I recovered my $40,000 and added another $13,000.  Wow!  Now I am back on track.  Well, almost.  In 2008, I dropped back to $71,000, again losing $40,000.  Finally, after all that pain and excitement, by the end of 2010, I recovered back to $103,000.  In ten years, my money had grown by $3,000. 

What if I had met my friend earlier, perhaps in 2000, before the first drop?  If I had met him, believed him and taken a chance with my money, I would have been ok.  Would I have actually done that?  It is difficult to say.  As a reminder, the annuity I have is called a variable annuity.  It lets me put my money in various types of mutual fund type accounts, including something that would have followed the S&P 500.  These are index funds.  The beauty of the annuity, though, is that when the market falls, the company continues to pay me 6% interest on my balance.  How different would my outcome have been?  Look at the chart below.

If I had put my money into this annuity in 2000, my money would have grown from $100,000 to $340,000!  My money would have more than tripled.  Leaving my money in my IRA I gained $8,000.  Putting it into an annuity would have given me $240,000.  How much would you have been willing to spend to get that return?

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

A Real World Example

I like to see how the market is doing each week, so I check out a few numbers, one being the Dow Jones Industrial and the other is the S&P 500.  Both are a selection of the largest stocks in the market and the numbers represent how the stocks have grown or shrunk in value.  Each morning when I turn on the news, since I live on the west coast, I get to see the opening of the stock market at 6:30.  After that, I get to see the Dow Jones and S&P numbers as they rise and fall.  The market is up today because of .....  The market is down because....  I am never really sure what to believe other than the numbers. 

For instance, sometimes the market increases because some big companies have laid off workers, with the assumption that less money given to payroll will add to the value of the company.  The next day the market drops because of rising unemployment.  That never makes sense to me, but that is the world in which I live.  As an investor, the best I can do is read, watch the market and pray.  Or I can do what a lot of other people do which is to put my 401k money into some funds that HR suggested, and then ignore them from then on.  Frankly, that is what I did for a long time and now I see the error of my ways. 

When I started this blog, I mentioned that I had spoken to a friend who showed me how I could be safer putting my money in an annuity rather than leaving it in my IRA.  I had complained that my money had not grown at all in the ten years that I had held on to it.  How could I possibly expect to live off money that wasn't even growing? 

What I got was a program that let's me still invest in the market and I can take advantage of the growth.  When the market goes down, the annuity pays me 6% until the market recovers.  The program isn't free, so I decided to do a bit of math to see if I was getting a good deal.

If you go to a web site called http://www.moneychimp.com/ and go find the Advanced CAGR or Compound Annual Growth Rate of the stock market.  There I found the percent change in the S&P 500 over the last 10 years.  Between 2000 and 2010, the S&P 500 rose, on average a little over 2%.  Really?  Here are the numbers.

S&P Annual Percent Change   
2010        14.32 
2009        27.11
2008       -37.22    
2007          5.46
2006        15.74     
2005          4.79
2004        10.82     
2003        28.72     
2002       -22.27    
2001       -11.98    
2000         -9.11     
Avg Return         2.40 

Here is how this looks graphically.
Another way to look at this is to add some money to it and see where it goes.  Let's take me, for example.  Over the years, I had managed to accumulate $100,000 in my 401k that I had rolled over to an IRA.  A popular way to invest was, and is, to put it into an index fund.  For instance, if I put my money into a fund that matched the S&P 500, my money would keep up with the market.  In 2000, that sounded like a pretty good idea since I could never keep up with all the changes.  So, let's see what happened to my money when I put it into the S&P 500 Index Fund and let it ride.
Keeping my money in that fund let it grow from $100,000 to $108,000.  Is that magic, or what?  Where did my money go?


Friday, July 1, 2011

Ten percent solution

What does it mean to have protection from market changes?  Let me give you an example.  First, I will take an investment that pays me 10% the first year, loses 10% the next year, pays another 10% the next year and so on.  If you were to take five years at plus 10% and five years at minus 10%, the average return should be zero.  That is, you should have as much money at the end as you started with ten years ago.  That would be nice, but it is a little like hoping your one A in Art is going to compensate for your two C's in Math and Science. 

Start with $100.  The first year you make $10, and let's assume you don't have to pay taxes on the growth.  That leaves you with $110.  The next year you lose 10% or $11.  Now you are down to $99.  In my graph below, I carried that logic out for 14 years. 




My $100 shrank to $85 losing $15 from my beginning balance.  I don't like that result. 

What if I were able to get something that always let me have the positive 10% growth when it happened, and then didn't pay anything when the return was negative.  How would that look?  In my first year I earn $10 and the next year I earn nothing, but I keep my $10.  The next year I earn $11 bringing my balance up to $121.  I like that much better.  Let's see how that looks over 14 years again.




In just 14 years, with protection, my account grew to $177.  How does that look in comparison to my other result?  I think it looks a whole lot better.  But 10% each year isn't really possible, is it?  In my next article I will give a real world example.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

The four cornerstones of a strong investment

What makes a good investment?  I want it to grow, be safe from market fluctuations, have a tax advantage so I can keep as much as I can, and I want to protect my family. 

I want it to grow at a reasonable rate so my money will keep up with inflation.  I want to know that I will be able to have at least what I am earning now without having to work at a job.  If that isn't possible, then I will at least want to have enough to cover the basics like housing, whether I am renting, paying property taxes and upkeep on my own house or wandering the country in a motor home. 

I have learned that the Rule of 72 tells me how quickly my money will double, assuming I can get a consistent rate of return.  If I depend on the market, my return is going to flucuate between making me rich one day and making me work into my twilight years just to stay alive. 

That means I also want some safety and consistency of growth.  If I am going to depend on some nest egg of cash to tide me through to old age, I want to be sure I have enough and that it won't disappear due to something I have no control over. 

I want a tax advantage.  I have shown that money that grows without taxes is far better than being taxed as it grows.  That eliminates things like CDs and savings accounts and even dividends received from mutual funds.  All are taxed as I receive income.  I want my money to keep up with inflation, too.  I have seen that inflation can eat up value of my money. 

Finally, I want my family protected if I die early and my wife and I protected if I live too long.  To get all that, I need a very well-rounded and well-managed portfolio of investments, plus some life insurance for protection.  Or do I?  Let's look at this one level at a time.

For growth, I can put my money into a savings account or some other type of cash account, and let the interest accumulate.  The best most banks and CDs pay, though, is about 2%, and we have seen that I need at least 5% to beat taxes and inflation.  I can invest in mutual funds and even hire a manager, but that can be both risky and expensive.  Still, not a bad idea, if I have enough money to start with.  Banks call such managers Wealth Managers and they like to work with people with large amounts of cash they don't know what to do with.  I am not one of those people, though, so count me out.  What I would really like it something that guarantees me growth every year that beats inflation and taxes.

For safety, I would also like something that protects me from markets crashes.  Again, savings accounts do that, though I still don't keep up with inflation.  I have been told that bond funds are good in a lowering market so that is a possibility.  But when the market goes back up, I need to run in and sell the bonds and move back to stocks.  Who has time for all that?  I want something that always keeps me above the market or at least doesn't deduct from my value when the market is poor.

My tax advantage comes with my 401k.  I even get free money from my employer up to a certain percentage of my income.  Maybe 401k's aren't so bad, after all.  I can also buy a Roth IRA which lets me have tax free growth and tax free withdrawals.  The trouble there is that I am only allowed to pay $5000 a year.  In my case, since I am over 50, I can invest $6000, but that won't really grow fast enough for my needs.  Remember, I need a million.  What I want is something that allows me to invest as much as I want, let's my money grow tax free and also lets me take it out tax free.

In my next few articles I will show the type of growth I can get with and without the protection of market safety.  I will also show how I can withdraw a living wage from my savings and still have it grow.  Such safety isn't free, but the consequences of no safety net is like driving down the freeway without a bumper and seatbelt.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

A note to my readers from around the world

As a blogger, I get to see the sources of people viewing my blog and I thank all of you for reading my story so far.  I would like to get some comments from my readers either directly on the blog or to me at floreyroy@gmail.com  In just a few weeks I have had almost 200 hits on my site so that makes me feel good about my writing. 

Readers have been mostly from the US, though I see some from Malaysia, France and Thailand.  From the people I have known over the years, I have an idea who those folks might be.  I am curious about my reader from Germany.  Are you enjoying this blog, as well? 

I have a number of ideas about where I want this to go.  Taxes and retirement are always a challenge is dealing with inflation, fluctuating markets and other disasters.  I also want to meet with other people dealing with my issues and interview them.

From there, I plan to talk about businesses I have tried over the years and other investments and how they panned out.  Each sounded very good on the surface and each took their toll on my finances.  I believe I have found the best business for me now so that will be a topic in coming days. 

I look forward to seeing more readers and followers to my blog.

Roy

Monday, June 20, 2011

Keeping up with and above the market

I started this story asking how much is too little.  That is, how do I know if I have enough money for my future or is it too little?  If it is too small, what do I need to do now?  Life is supported by income streams.  When we are born, we depend on our parents to pay for our food, clothing, home and so on.  Then we leave home and start our own streams with a job or business or both.  That stream needs to cover a number of things and how we approach those things is the real trick. 

We need to know what we need versus what we want.  If what we need exceeds our stream, we will do what we can to improve matters.  We might get assistance from the government or family or we might find a second job or even just a better job.  No matter, each has its own consequences and costs.  Ideally, you want to find an income stream that meets your needs for the present and future.  Along the way you would also like to have something you find interesting and challenging enough to keep you interested over the years.  Reaching retirement is, afterall, a long journey, especially when viewed from our youth.

I have found that a general rule for retirement money is to take 5% from whatever savings I have and combine that with any pensions I might also receive.  To do this assumes I will live another 20 years, and then I won't need any more.  It also assumes that there will be an equal amount of money from year to year.  What happened to retirees when the big crash hit is that they might have been on just year 10 or so with less than a few years left of funds.  And when they took money out, it actually cost them more than when they had more value.  For example, let's say I have $100,000 and I am taking my $5000 out each year.  The first year I draw my account down to $95,000 then $90,000 and so on.  But then the market crashes and my $90,000 is only worth $50,000.  What can I do?  I could just take 5%, or $2,500, but I need 5.  That means the money I take out is going to cost me double what I would have had to take out when I had my value.  That also leaves me with an even smaller fund to grow back when the market recovers.  Doing this is called annuitizing the fund, or taking out a set amount annually.  Unfortunately, I have no control over the value of the account as I draw against it.

I also need to be aware that taxes and inflation can eat up what I have earned. I need to find something that stays ahead; basically I need to row faster than the flow of the stream o rI will be pulled under.  The most common savings plans available now are the pre-tax accounts such as 401k, 403b, and IRAs.  These are all methods of saving as defined by our tax code.  We are allowed to take a certain percentage of our pay before taxes are applied and save it in an account we can't touch.  The rules of engagement are such that if we do take money out we pay a high penalty in taxes as a way to prevent us from using it too early.  Saving and growing pretax is always better than allowing my earnings to be taxed each year.  If you had one dollar and it was able to double every year for 20 years tax free, it would be worth over $1 million.  (If you want to check the math, take 2, the first double and multiply to the 19th power.  Isn't math fun?)  If you did that with another dollar and taxed it at 35% at each growth, you would only have about $27,000.  Big different, huh?

I like the tax free growth, but what I don't like is that my only choices are the mutual funds to invest my money.  Mutual funds are basically clusters of stocks with different types of risk.  Looking at the market in the last five years, though, it seems that all are just different ways of approaching a slot machine.  A gamble, no matter how you look at.  Or is it? 

Enter my annuity.  An annuity is a savings plan with a life insurance company.  I can give them money that will be invested in a number of different ways and at some time I can begin to withdraw a payment from it.  The beauty of the annuity is that I can have it pay me until I die, even if the original fund runs out of money.  I can also set it up so that should I die before my wife, she will also receive a payment until she dies.  Try to do that with a 401k.  There are a number of different plans, depending on where you are financially.  Annuities can be set up as traditional IRAs or Roth IRAs. 

A traditional IRA is similar to a 401k in that it is funded with pre-tax money.  A Roth IRA lets me invest with after tax money, my take home pay from work and invest it.  The growth is tax free as it grows and, better still, all the money comes out tax free, assuming I follow the rules of the plan.  If you have money from a previous employer, you can roll your money over as a rollover IRA.  In my case, I rolled over money I had in previously rolled over money that was shrinking rapidly in the market.  My plan lets me invest my money in the same sorts of mutual funds so I can still take advantage of market growth.  But here is the real beauty of the plan.  When the market value of my account drops, the insurance company keeps my fund at that highest amount and then pays interest.  When the market recovers, the company allows my fund to grow again.  What that means is I not only stay with the market as it grows, I also don't have to suffer the losses when it shrinks. 

As my money went in from previous money I had invested pre-tax, I will have to pay taxes on the money someday when I withdraw it.  Still, it is a far better solution than just praying the market will protect me.  I am using the power of a company worth ten times the value of Microsoft.  I think that is a pretty good deal. 

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Isn't a 401k enough?

I got the annuity which let me roll my IRA money over tax free.  It works just like any other rollover IRA.  In case you don't know, a rollover IRA is when I move my old 401k money from a former employer to an IRA, or Individual Retirement Account, that I can manage myself.  A funny thing about all these IRAs and 401k's; they are both based on investing in mutual funds and similar security-based vehicles.  Take a look at the Dow Jones Average over the last 40 years. 

Before 1980, a worker had limited choices for saving for retirement.  He had Social Security as some protection, but that was never intended to be the total amount needed.  As I said earlier, many large employers had pensions for employees.  Some were generous while others were not so, but all had the same thing in common.  They provided a retired worker with a lifelong paycheck.  Trouble was businesses didn't like having to keep so much money around that they couldn't use.  In fact, the AICPA, the folks who do all the external audits of corporate books, wouldn't even allow businesses to put the balances on their financials; at least, not as an asset or even a potential liability.  Meaning they couldn't tell investors that they were worth possibly billions more than they could show as their value as a business.  The reason was because companies were not allowed by the federal government to touch such funds.

One group, a union, got in trouble back then for spending the money on expenses other than retirement, while a few other pensions just disappeared over night.  The government, back when regulation was considered something good for the country, made it very difficult for companies to play with that money.  To this day, companies with pensions have very strict rules as to how to invest and spend pensions.  Then suddenly, businesses got a Get Out Of Jail card.  Along came the 401k.

Pensions allowed companies to reward their employees with free money after doing a number of years of service.  As the pension was based on salaries, everyone was able to get substantial lifetime benefits.  The money was saved tax free until it was paid out to the retiree. 
Then a lightbulb went off.  I am not sure where, but someone suddenly realized that companies could get rid of pensions altogether.  A pension had to be held by the company but a 401k was managed by a third party.  That meant that they could dump pensions forever and leave the employees on their own to figure out how to invest.  On paper that sounds very good, I suppose.  Do you have any idea what that did to the market?  Take a look at the Dow Jones Industrial Average, DJIA, from 1950 to now.

The DJIA is used as the baseline for the market.  We hear about it every day.  The Dow is up today, the Dow is flat, the Dow is plummeting.  From the 30's to 1980, the Dow went from 200 points to 900.  In that 50 years, the market increased by 7% per year (that is ((200-900/200)*100)/50).  Not bad.  From 1980 to 2000, it grew to almost 11,000 or about 56% per year (same math).  How did that happen?  401k's. Before 1980, only large companies like insurance companies and pensions were the major buyers in the market.  Ordinary people were just small potatoes.  We might buy a few hundred or a few thousand shares.  Some might have bought even more, but they didn't have any real effect on the market.  Only the big buyers had any influence.  And since the big buyers wanted stability and growth, the market slowly moved up.  Buying a stock and following required a certain level of sophistication and knowledge to do well.  Most small investors were lucky to make any money.  When I was growing up, we talked about the market like we talked about Las Vegas.  Investing was a gamble. 

401k's started a whole new game for Wall Street.  Suddenly millions, then billions than trillions of dollars were being thrown at their feet by unwitting buyers who only wanted to have something for their old age.  Wall Street exploded and the market grew exponentially.  And the market suddenly became far more volatile. 

After the big growth in 2000, the market crashed down to 9000 in 2002, the time after 9/11.  Again by 2007, it almost hit 14,000 when it all came tumbling down again.  Where were the 401k's during all that?  They were riding this roller coaster of value every day.  In 2009, it was down below 8,000.  All this volatility hurt millions of Americans of every age.  I lost almost half my money in a few days.  From 2000 to 2010, my balance stayed exactly the same value even though I had been adding to it all along.  The Rule of 72 says that I will never see my money double.  According to a fellow I know who is pretty good at investing, in any market, someone is making money.  Just not folks like me.

Throughout all this, one type of company has managed to survive and grow.  And the reason for this is because they have only one job....to protect the people who buy their products.  Insurance companies.  I want somebody on my side.


Wednesday, June 8, 2011

How much protection do you need?

I want to have money to retire on.  That is the plan.  But how much do I need?  And before I retire, I want to be sure my family is protected in case I die too soon.  The quandary is what if I don't live long enough and what if I live too long?  For the first, I need to figure out what I would not want my family to have to pay for if I were to go.  I heard about the DIME approach which I will share here. 

D is for debt.  How much debt do I have?  If I were to go, I would not want my wife to have to pay for that debt, so some sort of protection is order.  Fortunately I don't have a lot of debt. For an example, I will say I have $10,000 in debt, counting credit cards and auto loans.

The I is for income, or how much income would my wife need to get back to a normal life.  Typically, it takes about ten years to recover from a death.  If my income were $50,000, I would want her to have ten times that or $500,000. 

The M is for mortgage.  In my case, I have none.  If I had a home here, I would probably owe around $200,000.  In California, it could be more like $300,000 or $400,000 or even more. 

Finally, E is for Education.  If my kids were younger, I would want to set aside money for their education.  A state school costs around $15,000 a year.  For one child you need $60,000.  My kids are grown, but it would be nice to set aside money for grandkids. 

Putting it all together I would need:

D -   $10,000
I  - $500,000
M - $200,000
E -  $120,000 for two kids, be they my own or grandchildren. 

Total  $830,000.  A lot to set aside on my own.

My savings in my 401k would be taxable to my children as would my pension.  Assuming there is only 25% withholding, I would need well over $1 million in savings to protect my family.  However, a life insurance policy would pass to my heirs tax free, at least income tax free.  Congress is still playing around with the inheritance tax.  The last time I looked, the family would have to get over a million dollars to pay taxes.

I bought insurance for my wife with my sons as secondary, should we both go at the same time.  Surprisingly, only about 40% of Americans have any sort of life insurance, and most of them are underinsured.

Managing my debt allows me to buy less protection or at least have the protection go directly to my family instead of creditors.  Debt is another animal that will be considered later.

And then if I live too long, I have another issue.  What sort of protection did I buy?  Did it have any savings included?  That is something else to ponder as I continue my blog.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Starting Early, Starting Late

I have saved most of my life.  My brother used to tease me when I was quite young.  We would receive a dollar on Monday from mom for our allowance and by the end of Monday his dollar was gone.  By Friday, I still had my dollar in my pocket.  Nevertheless, I have managed to spend money on things I need and don't need, gotten in to debt when I shouldn't and taken money from my retirement when I should have left it alone.  The mindset was there, but sometimes it is difficult to see so far in the future.  Now that I am nearing retirement, or at least the age when I would like to retire, I see that living comfortably will be a challenge.  Where would I be if I had not spent my retirement?  When is the best time to start saving?

The best time is as soon as possible.  Not tomorrow, not next year.... Now.  Here is an example.  Mr. Early Starter decides to save $300 a month every month for 7 years and is able to get 8% interest.  Where as Ms. Start Later puts off saving until she turns 32.  By the time they are both 48, they end up with just about the same amount of money.  But Mr. Early only invested $25,200 whereas Ms. Start Later had to invest $61,200 or over double the amount.

            Early Starter                 Start Later
AgeAnnual ContributionTotal AccumulationAgeAnnual ContributionTotal Accumulation
   25               3,600                3,888            25
   26               3,600                8,067            26
   27               3,600              12,622            27
   28               3,600              17,520            28
   29               3,600              22,809            29
   30               3,600              28,522            30
   31               3,600              34,692            31
   32              37,467            32               3,600                    3,888
   33              40,465            33               3,600                    8,067
   34              43,702            34               3,600                  12,622
   35              47,198            35               3,600                  17,520
   36              50,974            36               3,600                  22,809
   37              55,052            37               3,600                  28,522
   38              59,456            38               3,600                  34,692
   39              64,212            39               3,600                  41,355
   40              69,349            40               3,600                  48,552
   41              74,897            41               3,600                  56,324
   42              80,889            42               3,600                  64,718
   43              87,360            43               3,600                  73,783
   44              94,349            44               3,600                  83,574
   45           101,897            45               3,600                  94,148
   46           110,048            46               3,600               105,567
   47           118,852            47               3,600               117,901
   48           128,361            48               3,600               131,221
 Total Spent   25,200  Total Spent
61,200

If you are my age, it all looks quite overwhelming, but if you are younger, I suggest you give serious though to beginning a savings plan now.